Monthly Archives: October 2016

A Vote for Trump Means Stability, Prosperity

Standard

As an American, I want to know that my president enjoys a heaping measure of common sense; a track record of good instincts, keen intuition, and sound judgment; and the ability to set and achieve beneficial, productive goals.

Donald Trump possesses those qualities. He has demonstrated a long history of negotiating deals with and against some of the smartest people on the planet, of acting cooperatively and diplomatically to achieve his ends, and of putting together the machinery of an effective organization.

The proof lies in his multi-billion dollar business successes. His most recent one became the new hotel he built within a stone’s throw of the White House. He finished the project ahead of time and under budget.

Can we not use that kind of expertise and effectiveness in the restoration of our economy, our public infrastructure, our military vitality, and our political strength? Do we not, in fact, need just that?

The unproven calumnies about contrived indecent acts Trump committed against a few women do not and cannot take away from those qualifications, chiefly because most people, understandably uncomfortable with what they heard and perhaps still tinged with some doubts and suspicions, don’t really believe them. In fact, had Trump not made some foolish, sophomoric comments 11 years ago that were surreptitiously recorded, not even a cursory basis for the alleged indecent acts would exist.

Hopefully, the rough campaign Trump has endured is teaching him a broader and more profound circumspection by which he will conduct himself with greater rectitude and by which he will value and make his own the desires and goals of a disenfranchised and deeply frustrated American citizenry.

While Trump exhibits the ability to change and to reinvent himself, Hillary Clinton remains a monolith. Years of practice have allowed the habits of self-aggrandizement, of rebellion against decency and morality, of reckless scandal, and of criminal behavior to take firm root in her nature.

Hillary Clinton will never change. She would bring a tenure of scandal, criminality, endless investigations, and nonstop banner headline reporting on her into the lives of Americans weary of her wrongdoing and pretentious piety.

How many times will Hillary Clinton blame others for her actions and the endless scrutiny they bring? Even now she and her mindless minions blame FBI Director James Comey because he announced investigators had found new emails on a device that neither Clinton nor her top aide, Huma Abedin, told investigators about previously.

Does that not fit a pattern of lies and deceit? Clinton and her staff were not forthright about the extent of the national security email violations, choosing instead to destroy or omit evidence. The only reason the new emails were discovered is because the FBI was investigating Abedin’s husband, Anthony Wiener, in an unrelated sex case.

If you want four more years of personal financial weakness, of political and social turmoil and division, and of scandals, cast a vote for Hillary Clinton.

If you want four years of personal financial strengthening, of a revitalized economy, of a stronger military, and of an American government that responds to and represents the interests of its citizens and veterans, and not those of illegal aliens, vote for Donald Trump.

Advertisements

Hillary’s Emails Found On Yucky Computer

Standard

Even the skewed polls show it: Donald Trump has caught up to or is passing Hillary Clinton as the preference among voters. In a fairly, accurately executed poll, Trump is most likely leading Clinton, perhaps by a sizable margin.

And early voting might be propelling Trump into the White House already.

Just two days after new shockwaves from her reckless email practices, Hillary’s candidacy is cracking and sinking into the dirt, as far as voters are concerned. The abyss is widening, too, amid news the FBI has obtained a warrant to review the new cache of emails found.

Trump had already been making a comeback, but as the FBI resumed its investigation into her criminal mishandling of sensitive, classified national security information, Hillary’s poll numbers and favorability began to slide into a chasm, and Trump’s numbers began to climb a stairway to the heights.

It may not be fair, but with the FBI’s new angle of inquiry coming from the personal computer of Huma Abedin and her sex-crazed husband, former Democratic Congressman Anthony Wiener, Hillary has been tainted once more by her personal and party association to man Trump calls “a sleazebag” and a man many people consider perverted in one way or another.

Wiener deserves the benefit of the doubt, and we confer our legal mantra upon his person: innocent until proven guilty. Yet Wiener is being investigated for inappropriate or sexual or perhaps pornographic communications with an underage girl via his computer. The FBI says it’s the same computer his wife, Huma, used to send and receive emails from Hillary.

The FBI will determine if the emails were and are classified and what light they shed on the question of Hillary’s national security breaches. In the meantime, voters feel a natural yuckiness about the proximity of their country’s national secrets to Wiener’s possibly surly, pornographic communiques and pictures.

Wiener gained notoriety while in office for sending pictures of his bulging or naked phallus to various females.

Known for her ruthlessness and pretense of piety, Hillary may throw Huma under the proverbial bus, if she thinks it’s necessary to save her own reputation and candidacy.

The thing is, more and more voters are feeling that it’s Hillary’s candidacy that should be thrown, not so much under a bus, but right at the grill of a speeding, oncoming 18-wheeler loaded to capacity!

The Hillary-Obama Axis of Contempt for Americans

Standard

angry-hillary-02-crop

The Obama Pentagon has decided to rescind its demand that American soldiers return the re-enlistment bonuses they earned and had been promised.

Still, thousands of soldiers were stripped of millions of dollars, and it remains uncertain whether those who complied with the Scroogean order will get their money back.

The fiasco highlights the contempt in which Obama, his hoped-for successor Hillary, and some Democrats have held our valiant military men and women. In their eyes, it wasn’t enough that our young men and women had put their lives on the line for our country.

The Obama administration wants to squeeze our soldiers for a few extra bucks. They don’t mind spending billions of our tax dollars to fund illegal aliens and Muslim refugees, but they want to penny pinch our own citizens, demanding the return of bonuses and hoarding money from VA hospitals that suffer from gross inefficiencies.

Hillary will continue those erratic, imbalanced, anti-American policies. She will take money from veterans and soldiers and give it to illegal aliens and Muslims.

Donald Trump will stop that misfeasance. He will not fund people who are here illegally. He will not pay to relocate potentially violent Muslims to a democracy and Western culture that they hate.

What Trump will do is spend money to make VA hospitals take care of the men and women they were supposed to take care of in a timely, effective manner – veterans. He will pay and allow soldiers to keep the bonuses they were promised. Trump will NOT cheat them.

Does that not make sense? Aren’t our president and our government Constitutionally mandated to look out for the common welfare and defense of our citizens?

The answer is, “Yes!”

Is our government supposed to take care of the citizens of other countries? Is that a Constitutional mandate?

The plain and simple answer: “No, it is not!”

Was not the whole point of the American Revolution to liberate ourselves from a dictatorial monarchy that not only failed to look out for all its subjects but made those subjects feel like they were NOT subjects.

Now Hillary and Obama make American citizens feel like they should be second class to foreigners, and the disturbing duo claim they are representing “American values” to con Americans into feeling guilty about demanding their government look out for them first.

They are not telling Americans the truth. How do we know? We know because America has NO tradition of encouraging ILLEGAL immigration. None. Yet they cunningly omit the word ILLEGAL when they speak of immigration. The only tradition America has encouraged is LEGAL immigration. Bring your poor and your tired LEGALLY.

When you don’t have a conscience, and when you see illegal immigrants as votes who can overwhelm the votes of real American citizens, it is easy to lie. That’s what Hillary and Obama do.

You are being conned, fellow citizen!

Vote for the candidate who stands for Americans and America, not the candidate who despises the military and puts foreigners first.

Megyn Kelly Preys on Trump, Fights Newt

Standard

megyn-and-newt

Newt Gingrich called out Megyn Kelly for inflammatory and untruthful reporting during a Fox News interview on her show Tuesday, Oct. 25.

A video of the heated exchange can be found at the link below:

http://nation.foxnews.com/2016/10/26/hot-debate-megyn-kelly-vs-newt-gingrich-trump-and-alleged-media-bias

Kelly, unable to get past Trump’s put-downs of her during the primaries, zeroed in – again – on the statements the business mogul made during a secret taping prior to an Access Hollywood episode 11 years ago.

She incorrectly stated – as she and others have in the past – that Trump said on the recording that he liked to grope women in their private areas “and kiss them against their will.”

That is false. Megyn Kelly lied. She spoke untruthfully. Trump absolutely never says that on the recording. Yet Kelly relayed as fact something that was and has always been fiction to continue to claw at Trump and to avoid losing a war of words to Newt Gingrich, which she did lose.

What does the recording say? What does The New York Times transcript of the recording say?

And when you’re a star, they LET you do it. You can do anything.”

Does everyone see the word “let”? Does everyone know what the word “let” means?

In other words, the women to whom Trump refers allowed, permitted, gave consent to him to do that – much in the same way groupies consent to have sex with the groups they follow – if, in fact, he actually ever tried to grope and kiss anyone and was not simply sticking his male chest out and thumping on it.

What’s more, what actually happens in the recording? What actually happens when the Access Hollywood bus arrives and Trump and Billy Bush are greeted by the beautiful Arianne Zucker? After just boasting about his actions with women, does Trump try it with beautiful Arianne in front of his friend to whom he boasted?

No. He doesn’t.

In fact, Trump only gives a verbal greeting to Zucker at first. He hugs her only after Bush suggests Arianne give Trump a hug. Then, with his own beautiful wife on his mind, Trump gives the hug saying, it’s okay with Melania! He was telling Arianne the only reason he is hugging her is because it’s okay with Melania!

The mendacity of mendacious Megyn Kelly would be astounding in any other context if it were not for the fact that she is just one of many of the mendacious, such as lying, cowardly, won’t-stand-up-for-gays Anderson Cooper.

She wanted to stand out as the filthiest of the filth, so Kelly went further by suggesting that Donald Trump might be “a sexual predator”. Below lie her exact, dissembling words:

What I said was, if Trump is a sexual predator, then it’s a big story. And what we saw on that tape was Trump himself saying that he likes to grab women by the genitals and kiss them against their will.”

Do a DuckDuckGo search for The New York Times Access Hollywood transcript and read the whole thing. Nowhere does Trump speak about doing anything to women against their will.

You are a liar, Megyn Kelly, a vicious prevaricator, deceiver, and dissembler who deliberately lied so people would think Trump said it and you would appear to be a relevant, incisive journalist. Like your words, your are utterly lacking in substance.

Further, Megyn Kelly supposedly has legal training. Yet she employed the term “sexual predator”, one of the gravest of designations a court, and only a court, can impose on a convicted defendant. It is a worse designation than “sexual offender”, which itself is a serious designation.

The designation “sexual predator” is usually, if not entirely, applied to those cunning men and women who stalk and violently molest or rape much younger victims, often torturing or killing them. Kelly used the term deliberately to shock voters and viewers, and her unfounded use of it, even in a conditional statement, represents a most grave, ethical breach for a journalist.

Fortunately, she subverted her own “logic” when, just prior to repeating the sexual predator term, she admitted she did not know if Trump was, in fact, a sexual predator.

We can go further. We don’t know that Trump did anything with anyone with their consent, much less against their consent.

Then why was she using the term???

I don’t know that Megyn Kelly is a pervert, but if she is, or if she is a sexual predator, it’s a huge story. Since she keeps using the word, sexual predator, maybe she has sexual predation on her mind. So if Megyn Kelly is a sexual predator, it’s a huge story that must be covered, just like we’re covering it right now by talking about it over and over again.

Please, make sure you tweet and post on Facebook and on any other social media that IF Megyn Kelly is a sexual predator – I don’t know that she is, and I’m not saying that she is, but maybe she is getting defensive if she denies it or takes issue with any talking about it – but if Megyn Kelly is a sexual predator, it’s a huge story, and we will cover it from now until Kingdom Come!

And even if we don’t know that it’s true, we are going to keep doing stories about if it is true. We’re going to keep driving it through your ear holes like a spike into Dracula’s heart!

Gingrich said it best in his righteous reply: “You are fascinated with sex, and you don’t care about public policy.”

Well, if Megyn Kelly is fascinated with sex… .

Uh, never mind!

Do You Want Hillary to Sell Out America?

Standard

I have been telling you about the need to peel away the layers of BS that cocoon the candidates and which isolate you from the truth, crippling your ability to vote wisely.

This need to peel away the layers applies to both the candidates and the people who speak for them, as it does to the media which filters the information that reaches you.

Some of you may be aware already of the comments of legendary journalist Bob Woodward, who broke the Watergate story for The Washington Post in the 1970s. That story led to the downfall of then President Richard M. Nixon. Others of you will not be aware, because most of the media seem to have ignored or to given the most cursory play to what Woodward said in an interview Sunday with Chris Wallace of Fox News.

Please keep in mind that I think most people and journalists would consider Woodward a reporter who looks through a liberal lens.

So on Sunday, with news out from Wikileaks that the King of Morocco gave $12,000,000 to the Clinton Foundation in exchange for a visit from Bill and Chelsea Clinton, and perhaps other considerations, Wallace asked Woodward for his take on the accusations that the Clintons used their foundation as a pay-to-play scheme.

It’s corrupt. It’s a scandal”, Woodward said in a quote provided by mostly secondary news sources but which was included in a story that appeared in the left-leaning Huffington Post. “The mixing of speech fees, the Clinton Foundation, and actions by the State Department, which she ran, are all intertwined. And it’s corrupt. You can’t just say it’s unsavory.”

That’s a damning judgment based on the facts, coming from a veteran, legendary journalist like Woodward.

We can extrapolate two things from Woodward’s judgment.

First, we see how the standards of journalism have changed. Forty years ago, the pattern of facts demonstrated by the Clintons, Hillary’s campaign, Hillary’s operation of the State Department, and their “charitable foundation”, would have undergone massive, relentless scrutiny by the press. Newspapers and TV networks would have pursued the story until they had uncovered everything. Character, or ethos, the ethical attitude given off by the person being examined in the public light, possessed a significance to news people and voters that it does not today. Hence, we see little meaty reporting on the Clintons.

Nonetheless, we arrive at our second and most important point, and it comes to you in a question: Do you really want to elect Hillary to sell out America?

Hillary is not going to change. She is not going to uncorrupt herself. She is not going to stop using elected office to enrich herself by selling what she can of her country. She cannot. Her habits have grown long, thick roots into her soul. She does not want to change. She could not change even if she wanted.

You can change, however. You can look the facts straight in the eye. You can acknowledge you have been misled, that a person you thought was good and well-meaning in fact was not. It’s a tough admission to make to yourself. I get it. The facts aren’t going to change for us, though.

Hillary says all the right things, but she does something different.

You can exercise your reasonableness and your foresight and say, “I cannot vote for someone of such weak and poor ethical character. I cannot vote for someone who bases her decisions on what will enrich her. I cannot allow Mrs. Clinton to expose our national security and our American lives to unnecessary danger. I cannot allow Mrs. Clinton to sell out my country.”

Join Americans of all political stripes, some who have not even voted in thirty or forty years, and take a stand.

I won’t let Hillary sell out my country!”

If You Want a Job, Vote for Trump

Standard

Most Americans want to be and feel valuable. They derive their value by their adherence to their personal beliefs, the usefulness and excellence of the products they make or the services they provide, and by the amount of money which they make.

Which candidate offers the best hope and help to give Americans the opportunity to merit the self worth they want?

Donald Trump does. Why?

The reasons Donald Trump gives Americans the best hope and help to achieve their self worth are his business savvy and his successful experience financing and building his businesses.

How many years have Americans been saying it was time to get someone, not merely outside of the Washington establishment, but outside the profession of law to enter the political sphere and run it successfully because of his executive business experience?

Now we have that person, Donald Trump. His confidence, his strong leadership, his savvy, and his skill at executive administration have allowed him to negotiate the most profitable deals and to complete projects on or ahead of time at or under budget.

Can you imagine the benefits to us by having a person like that seize the reins of government? Would he not gain control over this beast of bureaucratic federal government and make it more efficient, profitable, and responsive to Americans?

Donald Trump is the sterling candidate to restore America’s dwindling economic fortunes.

Why isn’t Hillary Clinton that person?

Hillary has no business experience. She’s an ivory tower lawyer. She has no experience creating jobs. She has no experience completing projects on time and on budget.

Hillary has created an institution, the Clinton Foundation, which has been described as a vast money laundering machine that enables special foreign and financial interests to obtain government favors by enriching the Clintons. That’s good for her but does not help Americans.

Hillary wants more illegal aliens and Muslim refugees to come to the United States, and to keep here those who are already illegal. Those policies not only create a strain on public budgets, but they add huge numbers to the potential employment pool, which means job creation has a harder task keeping up with the growing numbers of available workers.

Add to that Hillary’s support, not merely for open borders, but for globalization, which means manufacturing plants will continue to close in the United States, making more Americans income-less, and reopen in foreign countries.

All those Hillary policies mean more unemployment and loss of money to spend!

Finally, Hillary wants to force on Americans a medical insurance program, Obamacare, whose costs will skyrocket by 25% in 2017 and will continue to rise in subsequent years. Yesterday, the White House acknowledged the impending cost increases.

Hillary Clinton’s plan will take away jobs from Americans, create a greater likelihood Americans will not obtain employment, create a few, low-paying, part-time jobs, make Americans pay more for medical insurance, likely raise taxes even on middle and low income Americans, and increase our national and public debt, all while enriching herself and a few wealthy friends.

Donald Trump’s plan calls for reducing taxes, reducing expenditures, creating more wealth for the average person, creating more jobs, creating more income, returning manufacturing to the United States, expelling illegal aliens, and keeping out bloody terrorists and their sympathizers, which creates public safety and a more stable business environment.

If having a job and making money to support yourself and your family are NOT important to you, vote for Hillary.

If you want a job, if you want an opportunity to make more money and to take care of yourself and your family, vote for Donald Trump.

It’s that simple. It’s that clear.

Fatal Vision

Standard

Bravo to the Wall Street Journal for an exposé on a $500,000 donation from a key Clinton ally to the wife of the FBI agent who investigated Hillary’s emails. A coincidence? Boy, those coincidences keep piling up! We have a veritable mountain of them. The Clintons either receive or give money and – voila! – good things start to happen for them and for those who play ball with them.

How thickheaded and blind can voters be?