Tag Archives: abominable Hillary

Trump Fights Through Angry Media


The angry media is on the warpath!

Just look at the angry – not to mention dishonest or partial – storylines being published: The New York Times, “Donald Trump Pledges To Heal Divisions (And Sue His Accusers)”; Salon, Donald Trump, domestic terrorist: the man who tried to kill democracy – and why we had it coming”; The Washington Post, “Donald Trump, Officially Out of Ideas, Says He Will Sue…”.

Yet Trump, brimming with confidence, barrels through the barrage of negativity, taking his lumps, absorbing the sucker punches, sticks, and rocks of the media mob, and relentlessly dishing out a message of renewed national pride and strength through jobs for Americans.

The Times headline exudes the pure sarcasm of partisanship; Salon’s, a desperate hyperbole and a deficit of reason; The Post, a long-ago crippled journalism supported by the crutch of bitter partiality.

They are all losing credibility and the respect of growing numbers of Americans discontented with blinded news and commentary born of a malicious negativity.

Those organs exhibit a growing sense that their abominable candidate, Hillary Clinton, may not win. As the possibility of Hillary’s failure grows, it increases the pressure within each of her media minions, like stronger pressure in a ball that becomes so intense, the ball explodes. Some media minion heads are ready to do just that – pop! They have already given every advantage to Hillary, so they don’t have much else to offer besides a complete, utter breakdown and shoveling away of their journalistic ethics.

Trump should sue each and every woman who lied about him. How convenient that they appeared so mysteriously out of the woodwork during the last weeks of the campaign to discredit him during a tight race!

Trump can and will help to heal our nation. One way he’ll do that is to restore and empower our American economy. His work in that area will bring back a lot of self-esteem and morale to American workers. Trump is much, much more qualified to create prosperity than ideological Hillary. Hillary has zero economic and business-building experience. Zero.

She does know how to launder money and enrich herself through a fraudulent foundation. And she knows how to expose our classified secrets. So if you need a blueprint for a criminal enterprise, hire Hillary!

Trump is a domestic terrorist? How pathetic that the not-so-clever Salon writer (or perhaps editor) had to commit a grave act of equivocation to make his limp point. Not only that, but he or she tries to pin guilt on common Americans, just like the Democrats were hoping the San Bernardino slaughterer was a white man instead of the hateful, raging Muslim he actually was (Thank you for that revelation, Wikileaks!).

By the way, that email, and Salon’s reporting, manifests unequivocally a prejudice against a whole class of people which has gone unreported throughout this entire campaign: white men. Hillary hates white men. The Democrat Party and its media minions hate white men. In particular, they hate Southern men.

Trump has not spent one minute in office, so he’s not even had a chance to exhibit any anti-democratic tendency. On the other hand, Mr. Obama has been rebuked by the federal courts, and his continued use of “executive orders” demonstrates his willingness to bypass Congress and flout the operation of the Constitution. Wedge that in your crack, Salon writer!

The Post can certainly look to itself for experience in being out of ideas. A cursory read of their pages reveals that to even a modest intellect. This campaign, their editors and reporters have shown one, single, solitary idea: Get Hillary elected. That idea is lame, and it breeds other lame ideas.

For instance, the solution of one writer, WaPo columnist David Ignatius, to the growing deprivation of the average American worker is NOT to bring jobs back to America nor to create new ones here, as Trump wants, but to promote a government provided wage to everyone. Why? He is pushing the idea that jobs won’t, or shouldn’t, be brought back to or created for Americans, and that robots should be allowed to take jobs away from Americans, too.

That’s the kind of thinking that supports Hillary Clinton. In fact, I believe that is Hillary’s thinking. She wants open borders. She wants trade pacts that bleed America of jobs. She supports wealthy owners and their corporations keeping jobs and money overseas. She supports Wall Street’s financial overlords and the dominion they hold over Americans.

It may be ironic, but she is the elitist, not Trump.

The elites must be able to make more money at the expense of average Americans. The elites must not be interfered with in their greed for greater and greater profit. The power of the elites to dump American workers for foreign workers or to jilt American workers for robots must not be tampered with! Just disenfranchise them from the economic system, from any sense of productivity, shove a check in their pocket, and let them subsist in isolation with a pair of headphones on while they play “their music” and chew on Twinkies, void of purpose.

Disgusting! Go eat a Twinkie, Ignatius!

Those who are out of ideas, or who vomit bad ones, should be ignored. Ignatius is just such a person. The media minions of Hillary Clinton are just such people.


Abominable Big Mother Hillary


Here’s the piece on the abominable Hillary Clinton I said I would provide a few days ago.

This is a piece for people with a conscience, people who possess sound and sober judgment. This is not a piece for the superficial, for tabloid journalist readers whose sensibilities are so easily made itchy by the preachers of political correctness. If you are hellbent on supporting Hillary and unable to rationally consider the implications of your support, you will not be coddled and comforted here. You are too easily persuaded to embrace masks and pretense.

Let’s get this disclaimer out of the way. Few politicians, if any, are going to satisfy a majority of American voters. The candidates almost universally display character flaws of one degree or another. Those flaws jumpstart the decision-making principle of the lesser of two evils. Some have perceived that Trump’s brash, braggart style amplifies his flaws or increases the likelihood the accusations made against him are factual. They don’t like him or his style. That has hindered them from committing to him or, worse, has driven them into the bony embrace of the matronly Hillary.

I understand and can only encourage you to look deeper, to peel off the layers of BS. One way to do just that is to carefully examine the Wikileaks material and its significance.

Here we go.

In an earlier post, I discussed a comparison or correspondence between what Hillary has done and the list of abominations provided in Proverbs in the Abrahamic Testament. To be clear, I am not making a judgment about Hillary’s spiritual state or about her spiritual destiny. That is for someone much better and higher than me.

As citizens, however, we have the responsibility to judge the ethos, or character and credibility, of our officeholders and candidates for office and our officers. In that context, we render verdicts.

The selection comes from Proverbs Chapter 6, verses 16-19. Here’s how it reads in the 1917 Jewish Publication Society version:

There are six things which the LORD hateth, yea, seven which are an abomination unto Him: Haughty eyes, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood; A heart that deviseth wicked thoughts, feet that are swift in running to evil; A false witness that breatheth out lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren.”

Does Hillary Clinton have haughty eyes? You may or may not see them in her public persona, where she dons her mask. What has been written about her by those who worked for her, such as Secret Service agents?

Does Hillary Clinton have a lying tongue? So many instances of this have been documented, but for ease, I’ll just remind the reader of how FBI Director James Comey answered questions about her classified email claims. He declared one after another of her claims to be false.

Does Hillary Clinton shed innocent blood? She advocates and pushes abortion, the killing of human life in any of its preborn stages, including the half-born “partial birth abortion” stage, where the child’s body is turned around and pulled out of the womb, except for his or her head, and “doctors” insert a sharp, solid metal tool that punctures and crushes the baby’s skull, nothing short of bloody, gory, and ghastly.

Does Hillary Clinton have a heart that devises wicked thoughts? She created the “War Room” to strategize the defeat of the sexual assault claims against her husband and the destruction of the women who made those claims. She and her cohorts plotted the birther and Muslim campaigns against Obama. She has planned the false allegations against Trump and the theatrical fulfillment of those allegations to crush his candidacy: first, in regard to being used in ISIS training videos; second, in regard to violence at his rallies; third, in regard to his touching women without their consent.

Notice the pattern, because it is the pattern of black ops. Claim it, or warn about it, then manufacture the proof.

We now know from Wikileaks that Democrats and campaigners worked to create violence at the Trump rallies.

ISIS had not been using Trump in their training videos… but Hillary gave them the idea to do so. All they did was add him to the list of American politicians they had been using, including the Clintons!

Trump contributed his outlandish remarks on a genuine Access Hollywood video; however, Clinton and her team and the collaborative media timed the release of the video, which they had known existed for some time, for maximum effect on the voting public. Then they fabricated the ridiculously contrived scenarios, placing them over a span of years to create the impression Trump has been behaving badly all along!

Really? Thirty years ago!? On an airplane filled with people!? And then another incident – not in the elevator, which would have made sense – but outside the elevator!!!

Does Hillary have feet that are swift in running to evil? We’ve covered that.

Is Hillary a false witness that breatheth out lies? Covered that, too, though there is so much more. Her testimony before various congressional and senate committees and her official statements to and about the relatives of the Benghazi victims and the revelations in the Wikileaks dumps about her true feelings toward Americans, gays, Catholics, open borders, Wall Street, etc., stand out as monstrously deceptive.

Does Hillary sow discord among brethren? Hillary’s labeling of Trump, attempting to divide him irrationally from various minorities, to stoke fear in them so as to be averse to voting for him, and her use of America shaming to silence dissent and traditional patriotism all constitute forms of discord. Add in the Wikileaks revelations that her faction actively sought to infiltrate and change the beliefs of the Catholic Church to suit her political correctness and Big Mother ambitions, and you have a firm foundation for the claim of sowing discord among our political brethren and among our spiritual brethren.

Using the biblical metric in Proverbs, how does any Catholic or Protestant or Jew vote for Hillary Clinton? Indeed, how does any atheist vote for Hillary? While atheists may not agree with the supernatural element to those moral principles detailed in Proverbs, I bet many accept the morality they teach.

Yes, it may be that Trump has exemplified two or three of those abominations. We are employing the principle of the lesser of two evils, however, and Trump has even apologized for his filthy talk.

It is unthinkable that a woman or man of faith or rational conscience could pull a lever for Hillary Clinton, Big Mother of abominations.